Anyone up for packaging Antora

[Matthew Miller]

The Fedora Docs project is using Antora (https://antora.org/), which is written in Node.

The Fedora Packaging Committee is interested in using our centralized docs system, but understandably feels a bit hypocritical using a tool which isn't even packaged. Okay, fair enough.

Is there anyone here interested in helping (*cough* by which I mean "doing") get this into RPM form?
_______________________________________________
nodejs mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-***@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/ar

[Jared K. Smith]

Over the past year, I've made two attempts at starting to package Antora
properly. Both times, I got a dozen or so dependencies packaged up, and
then realized that Antora still depends on nodegit, which bundles its own
copy of openssl, openssh, etc. I keep hearing that upstream might be
moving away from nodegit.

I'll try to look at the upstream code again today and see if that's still
the case.

-Jared

Post by Matthew Miller
The Fedora Docs project is using Antora (https://antora.org/), which is written in Node.
The Fedora Packaging Committee is interested in using our centralized docs
system, but understandably feels a bit hypocritical using a tool which
isn't even packaged. Okay, fair enough.
Is there anyone here interested in helping (*cough* by which I mean
"doing") get this into RPM form?
_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Zuzana Svetlikova]

FYI https://gitlab.com/antora/antora/issues/264#note_122453475

Upstream should release new version of Antora without nodegit soon.

Post by Jared K. Smith
Over the past year, I've made two attempts at starting to package Antora
properly. Both times, I got a dozen or so dependencies packaged up, and
then realized that Antora still depends on nodegit, which bundles its own
copy of openssl, openssh, etc. I keep hearing that upstream might be
moving away from nodegit.
I'll try to look at the upstream code again today and see if that's still
the case.
-Jared

Post by Matthew Miller
The Fedora Docs project is using Antora (https://antora.org/), which is written in Node.
The Fedora Packaging Committee is interested in using our centralized
docs system, but understandably feels a bit hypocritical using a tool which
isn't even packaged. Okay, fair enough.
Is there anyone here interested in helping (*cough* by which I mean
"doing") get this into RPM form?
_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Jared K. Smith]

I'll try to dive back in and work on packaging up Antora properly once they
cut a 2.0.0 release. In the meantime, I'm working on packaging
isomorphic-git as one of the new dependencies.

-Jared

Post by Zuzana Svetlikova
FYI https://gitlab.com/antora/antora/issues/264#note_122453475
Upstream should release new version of Antora without nodegit soon.

Post by Jared K. Smith
Over the past year, I've made two attempts at starting to package Antora
properly. Both times, I got a dozen or so dependencies packaged up, and
then realized that Antora still depends on nodegit, which bundles its own
copy of openssl, openssh, etc. I keep hearing that upstream might be
moving away from nodegit.
I'll try to look at the upstream code again today and see if that's still
the case.
-Jared

Post by Matthew Miller
The Fedora Docs project is using Antora (https://antora.org/), which is
written in Node.
The Fedora Packaging Committee is interested in using our centralized
docs system, but understandably feels a bit hypocritical using a tool which
isn't even packaged. Okay, fair enough.
Is there anyone here interested in helping (*cough* by which I mean
"doing") get this into RPM form?
_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

_______________________________________________
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines